Post by account_disabled on Feb 14, 2024 9:50:44 GMT
The standard support offered by cloud providers or hyperscale providers is now clearly very mature in terms of usage of cloud services and cost-effectively so there is no reason to buy a managed service. or complex for many companies. of people fully or mostly agree with this. For me it's more of a matter of perspective. There is often little distinguishing factor between cloud service providers and cloud service providers as they often combine the two in their own product portfolios or also act as partners with hyperscale providers.
In my opinion this is a prerequisite in order to build and manage a mixed landscape. Why cloud services aren't always the first choice can be seen elsewhere: Four in 10 respondents were dissatisfied with the quality of managed multi-cloud services compared with managed security Nauru Email List services, managed backup and storage and other managed services. Dissatisfaction rates there are significantly lower. One explanation for the urgent need to catch up with the quality of managed multi-cloud services could be the lack of expertise in the field and its own experts. There are similar sentiments that hybrid architecture operating models are still relatively young. There is definitely room for improvement.
However it seems to me questionable whether respondents would be more satisfied with cloud providers and hyperscale providers. Complex cloud management ultimately requires clarification on a variety of questions when using cloud services. Which cloud service is best for which cloud provider or hyperscale provider is best for your company? How should the future architecture be designed? The management of cloud services is often quite complex. Interactions between individual services and between services and existing local systems must be orchestrated efficiently and clearly. Managed cloud services pose additional challenges compared to traditional hosting services. For them this means that they must constantly develop and adapt their skills and working methods in order to be ready for new requirements.
In my opinion this is a prerequisite in order to build and manage a mixed landscape. Why cloud services aren't always the first choice can be seen elsewhere: Four in 10 respondents were dissatisfied with the quality of managed multi-cloud services compared with managed security Nauru Email List services, managed backup and storage and other managed services. Dissatisfaction rates there are significantly lower. One explanation for the urgent need to catch up with the quality of managed multi-cloud services could be the lack of expertise in the field and its own experts. There are similar sentiments that hybrid architecture operating models are still relatively young. There is definitely room for improvement.
However it seems to me questionable whether respondents would be more satisfied with cloud providers and hyperscale providers. Complex cloud management ultimately requires clarification on a variety of questions when using cloud services. Which cloud service is best for which cloud provider or hyperscale provider is best for your company? How should the future architecture be designed? The management of cloud services is often quite complex. Interactions between individual services and between services and existing local systems must be orchestrated efficiently and clearly. Managed cloud services pose additional challenges compared to traditional hosting services. For them this means that they must constantly develop and adapt their skills and working methods in order to be ready for new requirements.